Coffee Break with Liz and Kate » Headline, Liz's Rants » The brightest bulb in the box? -Liz’s rant
The brightest bulb in the box? -Liz’s rant
Today, I bring you yet another head-spinner – this time, one that’s gonna hit you right in the wallet. And with gas at $4 a gallon (up 125 percent since January 2009, meaning we’re paying $1,000 more per year), food prices up 26 percent and one in seven Americans on food stamps, this one could go over like a lead balloon.
A new 100-watt LED light bulb has recently been introduced to replace those incandescent bulbs we all know and love. For the low (low) price of $50, you, too, can own one of these bulbs. That’s right. Fifty dollars for a light bulb. I guess we really shouldn’t be surprised. If you’ve priced those dastardly curly-q bulbs, you already know they’re not cheap, either. Running roughly $4 and up for a single unit, many people could end up sitting in the dark if money’s tight. Let’s see. Shall we buy this whole chicken and feed the family or get a light bulb? Hmmm.
If you think this forced choice isn’t coming soon, think again. The 100-watt incandescent won’t be available as of this coming January. (Note to self – hit the dollar store and buy a few more packs of light bulbs before they’re all gone.) By 2014, they’ll be all but non-existent. Of course, there’s also the issue of the new bulbs not necessarily fitting in old lighting fixtures, but don’t worry. I’m sure it’ll be fine.
Just like most other things in the realm of all things government, the incandescent ban came before anyone thought things through. Many more of their bright ideas and we won’t be able to afford our own existence.
Filed under: Headline, Liz's Rants · Tags: attitude, coffee break with liz and kate, light bulb ban, light bulbs, liz's rant, shopping










Agreed Liz…..
and its not just the price with LEDs…
LEDs – like CFLs before them- have recently been found to have serious home breakage and disposal concerns, having lead, arsenic and toxic vapor content,
according to University of California (Davis and Irvine) research
http://ceolas.net/#li20ledx
Overall,
the ban on the popular simple cheap safe types of incandescents surely makes no sense, from any perspective…
not just re freedom of choice,
not just re usage safety,
not just re there not being an electricity shortage for paying
customers (and even less so in the future, with all the renewable and
low emission alternatives)
- but also the overall society energy savings are small, less than 1%, as from US Dept of Energy and EU institutional own figures (http://ceolas.net/#li171x).
Besides, notice how light bulb manufacturers have pushed for and
welcomed this ban on cheap unprofitable light bulbs.
(http://ceolas.net/#li12ax with documentation and references).
Perhaps our gubment just doesn’t like the old saying: “The lights are on but no one’s home” and they are looking to change it to: “The folks are home with no lights on”. Anyone else wary of those innocent looking little fake battery taking “candles”? Candles are “dangerous” ya know….